Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad Inc. v. City of Chicago (Bill of Rights Rail)
Legal Issues
The Facts
Chicago required the Burlington and Quincy Railroad to build grade separations at its own expense where a street crossed railroad tracks — effectively requiring the railroad to give up property rights without compensation. The railroad argued this was an uncompensated taking.
The Issue
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires states to pay just compensation when taking private property
The Rules
Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause
Fifth Amendment Just Compensation Clause
Selective incorporation of Bill of Rights against the states
The Application
Chicago's requirement that the railroad construct grade separations at its own expense effectively took the railroad's property by stripping it of its right to use the land in its existing manner and forcing it to bear costs for public benefit without compensation. Though the city imposed this requirement for the legitimate public purpose of managing street-railroad intersections, it did so without providing payment—the essential protection the Fifth Amendment guarantees when property is taken for public use. The Court applied the incorporation doctrine to find that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause extends the Fifth Amendment's Just Compensation requirement to the states, meaning Chicago could not accomplish through a state-mandated burden what the federal government was constitutionally prohibited from doing. The railroad's loss of property rights and economic burden, imposed by state judicial proceedings for public purpose without compensation, therefore violated due process.
The Conclusion
Court held that the Just Compensation Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. A foundational incorporation precedent.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support