Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education (1985)
Legal Issues
The Facts
The Cleveland Board of Education dismissed tenured civil service employees including James Loudermill without providing them a pre-termination hearing. Ohio law provided for post-termination proceedings. Loudermill argued the lack of a pre-termination hearing violated due process.
The Issue
Whether due process requires a pre-termination hearing before dismissal of a public employee who has a property interest in continued employment
The Rules
Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process
Property interest in public employment — created by state law
Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test
The Application
Ohio's civil service statute granted Loudermill and other classified employees a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment by limiting removal to only those shown unfit. Although Ohio provided a post-termination hearing opportunity, the Court found this procedure constitutionally inadequate because the deprivation had already occurred—the employees had already lost their jobs without any prior notice or chance to respond. The Court held that the Due Process Clause requires something more: at minimum, an informal pre-termination opportunity for the employee to present their side before the employer makes its final dismissal decision. This pretermination safeguard need not be elaborate, but it must occur before, not after, the deprivation takes effect.
The Conclusion
Court held 8-1 that due process requires at minimum notice and an opportunity to respond before termination of a tenured public employee. Justice White wrote for the majority.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support