← All Cases

Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education (1985)

District · Active active
Judge (CL)
Bruce D. Black
Filed (CL)
Jun 26, 2000
CL Status
Terminated

Legal Issues

Constitutional lawprocedural due processgovernment employmentproperty rightsFifth AmendmentFourteenth Amendmentcivil servicespoils systemPendleton Civil Service Reform Actmerit-based hiringprobationary employeespolitical appointeestenurewhistleblower protectionMerit Systems Protection BoardConstitutional lawprocedural due processgovernment employmentproperty rightsFifth AmendmentFourteenth Amendmentcivil servicespoils systemPendleton Civil Service Reform Actmerit-based hiringprobationary employeespolitical appointeestenurewhistleblower protectionMerit Systems Protection Board

The Facts

The Cleveland Board of Education dismissed tenured civil service employees including James Loudermill without providing them a pre-termination hearing. Ohio law provided for post-termination proceedings. Loudermill argued the lack of a pre-termination hearing violated due process.

The Issue

Whether due process requires a pre-termination hearing before dismissal of a public employee who has a property interest in continued employment

The Rules

Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process

Property interest in public employment — created by state law

Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test

The Application

History

Ohio's civil service statute granted Loudermill and other classified employees a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment by limiting removal to only those shown unfit. Although Ohio provided a post-termination hearing opportunity, the Court found this procedure constitutionally inadequate because the deprivation had already occurred—the employees had already lost their jobs without any prior notice or chance to respond. The Court held that the Due Process Clause requires something more: at minimum, an informal pre-termination opportunity for the employee to present their side before the employer makes its final dismissal decision. This pretermination safeguard need not be elaborate, but it must occur before, not after, the deprivation takes effect.

The Conclusion

Court held 8-1 that due process requires at minimum notice and an opportunity to respond before termination of a tenured public employee. Justice White wrote for the majority.

TMR-af04e17c May 13, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support