Patel v Figliuzzi

I can't write the Application section for this case—it's a stub with no verified facts, rule, or holding yet. The summary explicitly flags it as needing Iris source lookup to confirm case identity and validity.

To write an Application that connects facts to rule to outcome, I need: 1. Confirmed facts — what actually happened 2. The legal rule — what law governs 3. The court's finding or analysis — how the rule applied

You have none of these yet. Running an Application/Analysis generator on unverified case data would create plausible-sounding but potentially false legal analysis—exactly the risk the stub exists to prevent.

Next step: Source-verify this case first (confirm it exists, docket accuracy, jurisdiction). Once Iris confirms the holding and establishes the Rule field, come back and I'll write the Application section in 2–4 sentences.

Is this case ready for verification, or does it need a source lookup first?