Trump v. J.G.G.

The constitutional requirement of notice and an opportunity to be heard before deprivation of liberty applies directly to AEA-designated detainees facing removal to third-country confinement—the government cannot proceed with transfer without first providing individualized notice and an opportunity for judicial review. The Court held that habeas corpus, filed in the district of confinement, provides the constitutionally adequate mechanism for this review, whereas class-wide emergency equitable relief in the D.C. Circuit cannot fulfill this requirement because it is structurally divorced from the location and imminence of the threatened transfer. This ruling reorders the remedy pathway from prospective class-wide TROs to individual habeas petitions that must be filed with urgency in the confining jurisdiction, preserving constitutional protection while shifting practical pressure onto detainees and burden of proof onto the government.