Corner Post v. Federal Reserve Board
Case Overview
A North Dakota truck stop that opened in 2018 sued to challenge a Federal Reserve rule about debit card transaction fees that had been final law since 2011. The government argued the suit was time-barred—federal law gives challengers six years from when a rule takes effect. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in July 2024 that the six-year clock starts when the rule injures a specific party, not when published. For a business that didn't exist until 2018, the window opened in 2018. The consequence is significant: there's now no effective statute of limitations on administrative rules.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Conclusion
**The Supreme Court held 6-3 that the statute of limitations for challenging administrative rules begins when the rule injures a specific party, not when the rule is published.** This means businesses can challenge even decades-old rules if they did not exist when the rule took effect. The decision effectively eliminates any enforceable limitations period for administrative rule challenges.
No circuit court data for this case.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support