← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Bartenwerfer v. Buckley

No. 21-908 SCOTUS · Decided Decided SCOTUS
Cert Granted: May 2, 2022 Argued: Dec 6, 2022 Decided: Feb 22, 2023

Case Overview

Kate Bartenwerfer sought to discharge in bankruptcy debts arising from her husband's fraudulent misrepresentations in the sale of a house, arguing she was unaware of the fraud. The Supreme Court held 9-0 that the bankruptcy exception for debts incurred through fraud applies even where the debtor herself did not commit the fraud, if the debt is attributable to a partner's or agent's fraud.


The Facts

Kate and David Bartenwerfer sold a house and failed to disclose known defects. David made fraudulent misrepresentations; Kate claimed she was unaware of the concealed problems. The buyer obtained a state court judgment against both. Kate sought to discharge her share of the debt in bankruptcy. David's fraud-based debt was nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(2)(A); the question was whether Kate's debt was also nondischargeable.

The Application

History

Kate Bartenwerfer's liability for the judgment arose directly from the fraudulent sale of a house where her co-obligor David made material misrepresentations about the property's condition, regardless of whether Kate personally knew of or participated in the deception. Under Section 523(a)(2)(A), the relevant inquiry is the source of the debt - whether it originated in fraud - not the personal knowledge or culpability of the debtor seeking discharge. Because the judgment debt was attributable to fraud committed by her partner in a joint transaction, Kate's obligation remained nondischargeable in bankruptcy even absent her personal participation in the fraud.

The Conclusion

**Bartenwerfer v. Buckley established that the fraud discharge exception in bankruptcy law is not limited to debtors who personally committed the fraud.** Imputed fraud from a partner or agent is sufficient to render a debt nondischargeable. The ruling has practical consequences for spouses and business partners who may find debts arising from another's fraud nondischargeable in their own bankruptcy proceedings.

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Filed -
Judge -
CL StatusActive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert GrantedMay 2, 2022
StatusActive
Filed (CL) -
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-d80f7845 Jul 13, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support