FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project
Case Overview
The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the FCC's 2017 decision to retain and modify its media ownership rules under the Communications Act and APA. The Court held that the FCC adequately explained its reasoning under the arbitrary-and-capricious standard and did not need to conduct additional empirical studies before relaxing ownership limits.
The Facts
The FCC retained some media ownership rules while relaxing others in a 2017 order. The Third Circuit vacated the order, holding the FCC had not adequately considered the effect of rule changes on minority and female ownership of broadcast stations. The Supreme Court reversed.
The Application
The FCC satisfied the APA's arbitrary-and-capricious standard by explaining its reasoning for retaining and modifying media ownership rules, even though the Third Circuit had found the agency's analysis of effects on minority and female station ownership inadequate. The Supreme Court rejected the lower court's demand for additional empirical study, holding that the APA requires only reasoned explanation, not new research, when the existing record supports the agency's deregulatory choice. By affirming the FCC order, the Court applied core APA doctrine: agencies must explain their reasoning but need not commission new studies before loosening regulatory limits.
The Conclusion
**Unanimous ruling for FCC.** Thomas wrote the majority. FCC's media ownership deregulation was upheld as adequately reasoned under the APA.
No circuit court data for this case.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support