Governor Shapiro v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Case Overview
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro sued the Trump administration over the freeze of federal funding and grants. Plaintiffs are requesting the court enjoin defendants' from freezing, pausing, or conditioning the disbursement of congressionally awarded funds.
The Application
Governor Shapiro argued the Trump administration's freeze violates the Appropriations Clause because the funds have already been congressionally designated. The administration must justify the freeze as within executive authority, while the court assesses whether the state established likelihood of success on its constitutional impoundment claim and qualifies for preliminary injunctive relief to resume fund disbursement.
The Conclusion
The court issued a decision on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction addressing the legality of the federal funding freeze and the executive's authority to pause disbursement of congressionally appropriated funds.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support