Illinois v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
Case Overview
A coalition of states sued the Trump administration over the freezing of federal funds that help states prepare for emergency preparedness and response unless they assist the federal government in immigration enforcement.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
The Trump administration froze emergency preparedness grants to states that refused to cooperate with immigration enforcement. The states argue that conditioning essential emergency funds on immigration assistance is coercive, unrelated to the grants' purpose, and impermissibly commandeers state resources for federal enforcement priorities.
The Conclusion
The court issued a decision on this matter, with Judge William E. Smith resolving the constitutional questions surrounding federal grant conditioning and the boundaries of federal spending power over state emergency preparedness programs.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support