New Mexico v. Musk
Case Overview
A coalition of states sued Elon Musk and DOGE in federal court, arguing that Musk was running a federal agency without ever going through Senate confirmation — which the court found, in a May 2025 ruling, was likely required. The judge dismissed President Trump from the case (presidents can't be enjoined from their official duties), but Musk and DOGE stayed in, and the court documented real harm: mine shafts left open, coal fires spreading, safety services in New Mexico's mining and minerals division cut off because federal funds were shut down. As of spring 2026, the case is in discovery and moving forward.
BrynoDC Coverage 3 videos
The Conclusion
**Federal judge found that Elon Musk likely required Senate confirmation to head DOGE.** The May 2025 ruling determined probable Appointments Clause violation, allowing states' claims to proceed into discovery against Musk and DOGE. President Trump was dismissed on executive immunity grounds; documented harms to state mining services supported the case's advancement.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support