New York v. Trump (Wind Energy 2025)
Case Overview
A coalition of states sued the Trump administration over the presidential memorandum which pauses all federal approvals for the development of offshore- and onshore-wind energy.
The Application
States challenging the memorandum argue the blanket pause bypasses required environmental review, violates statutory approval procedures, and lacks rational basis. The administration contends the President possesses inherent authority over federal lands and permitting authority. The legality turns on whether the memorandum complies with mandatory procedural and statutory frameworks governing wind energy approvals.
The Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Patti B. Saris in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on the merits of the APA and statutory claims regarding the wind energy pause memorandum.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support