← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas

No. 20-493 SCOTUS · Decided Decided SCOTUS
Cert Granted: Oct 18, 2021 Argued: Feb 22, 2022 Decided: Jun 16, 2022

Case Overview

The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Tribe sought to offer bingo and other gaming on their reservations in Texas; Texas argued the tribes were barred from gaming by the terms of their Restoration Acts. The Supreme Court held 5-4 that the Restoration Acts incorporated the Tigua and Alabama-Coushatta tribes' gaming prohibition by reference to Texas law, not as a static bar, and required courts to apply Texas gaming law as it exists from time to time.


The Facts

The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Tribes were restored to federal recognition by Restoration Acts that conditioned tribal gaming on compliance with Texas law. Texas broadly prohibits gaming. The tribes offered bingo and other games, arguing state gaming law that permitted such games for charities should apply to them.

The Application

History

The Court's dynamic reference standard meant the tribes' gaming rights were not frozen at the Restoration Acts' enactment but instead tracked what Texas law permits non-tribal entities at the time of the dispute. The tribes could offer bingo and other gaming if comparable activities were lawful for charitable operators or other non-tribal entities under current Texas law, rather than facing a permanent bar simply because Texas had broadly prohibited gaming when the Acts were passed. This framework required courts to conduct factual comparisons between the specific games the tribes sought to offer and the games Texas law currently authorized for non-tribal actors. The outcome thus depended on whether the tribes could demonstrate legal equivalence between their proposed gaming and gaming forms that Texas law had come to permit elsewhere.

The Conclusion

**Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas established that Restoration Act tribes in Texas are governed by a dynamic reference to state gaming law, meaning the permissibility of specific gaming activities depends on Texas law's current treatment of equivalent activities by non-tribal entities.** The ruling requires courts to make detailed comparisons between specific games offered by the tribes and what Texas permits for others.

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Filed -
Judge -
CL StatusActive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert GrantedOct 18, 2021
StatusActive
Filed (CL) -
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-a23f0fd7 Jul 13, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support