SNAP Benefits Suspension
6 proceedings tracked · Active
USDA actions in 2025 targeting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program included suspension of certain state waivers for Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWDs), termination of SNAP benefits for individuals based on immigration status determinations, and data-collection mandates that states challenged as coercive. Litigation challenged these actions as APA violations and, in some cases, as unconstitutional conditions on federal funding.
SNAP Benefits Suspension
Case No. 1:25-cv-01650
D.D.C. SNAP challenge before Judge Cobb contesting USDA's cancellation of state ABAWD work-requirement waivers without following required notice-and-comment rulemaking.
SNAP Benefits Suspension
Case No. 3:25-cv-06310
N.D. Cal. SNAP challenge before Judge Chesney targeting USDA's immigration-status-based SNAP benefit terminations as violating the Food and Nutrition Act's eligibility framework.
SNAP Benefits Suspension
Case No. 1:25-cv-08869
D.D.C. SNAP data-collection mandate challenge asserting USDA's demands for state beneficiary data constitute coercive conditions on federal Spending Clause funding.
SNAP Benefits Suspension
Case No. 1:25-cv-13165
Companion SNAP suspension challenge raising APA arbitrary-and-capricious claims against USDA's unilateral revocation of state-negotiated ABAWD waiver agreements.
SNAP Benefits Suspension
Case No. 1:25-cv-00569
SNAP challenge that reached a decided disposition, addressing the statutory scope of USDA's authority to revoke state waivers mid-year without advance notice to affected beneficiaries.
SNAP Benefits Suspension
Case No. 3:25-cv-09508
Ninth Circuit SNAP challenge that reached a decided disposition, setting regional precedent on state standing to challenge USDA ABAWD waiver cancellations.